Michal  Kocis
29. 3. 2013 • 12:26

IBM odpovedela docela rychleHere's what Ellison got wrong yesterday, according to Sibley:1. Oracle's benchmark tests were made against three-to-five-year-old IBM servers, not more recent models.2. Oracle sometimes stacked the deck in its tests, using servers with up to twice as many CPU cores—hence more raw processing power—than the IBM systems it used.3. Oracle's price claims were just plain wild, Sibley says. In one of Ellison's slides, he claimed that an Oracle $270,000 T58 was faster than a $1.9 million IBM P780. Those were not comparable setups, Sibley says. For similarly configured machines, IBM servers are priced about the same as Oracle's new servers, he says.Plus, IBM's servers help save enterprises money on software licenses, he says. That's because IBM servers will run more apps on a single server, he says. For enterprise software that's priced per server, companies can pay less for software licenses.Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/ibm-oracle-ceo-2013-3...

Názor byl 1× upraven, naposled 29. 3. 2013 16:59

Martin Kobelka
28. 3. 2013 • 12:32

Tohle by mělo smysl hlavně u mobilů, android implementovaný do hardwaru by byl určitě rychlejší než teď kedyž jede na virtuálním stroji.

George76
28. 3. 2013 • 11:53

sem si rikal co je s panem sedlakem, ze uz tu dlouho nebyl oslavny clanek o oracle... takze uz je vsechno v poradku.

Rudidlo
Rudidlo
28. 3. 2013 • 7:54

"Oracle už dříve do čipů integroval šifrování dat a nyní přidává i technologie pro práci s databázemi a Javou."Jak tam budou implementovat bezpečnostní aktualizace Javy?

Určitě si přečtěte

Články odjinud