>Zial zrejme stale nechapes vyhody .NET a Javy, ktore som sa snazil napisat.
.NET ani JAVA nemaju ziadne technicke vyhody. Ak maju nejake vyhody tak su ekonomicke,teda nie odborne informaticke. Aj tie su diskustabilne.
> Ich zmazanie zo sveta, po com zrejme ty tuzis,
>nie je riesenim a je to krok spet.
Davas mi do ust, co som nepovedal. Ak sa kvalitny programator v C, ci jazyku symbolickych instrukcii (v cestine jazyku symbolickych adres) rozhodne pouzit C#, Java alebo VB.NET, proti tomu nic nemam, Ale ma zasadne vyhrady voci tomu, aby sa tieto technologie pouzivali na vyuku programovania. Lebo tam kazia system. Doelsdkom toho, ze sa pouzivaju a kazia SW, je mnou citovana statistika, ktora ukazuje,ze az 62% SW ma bezpecnostnu chybu. Preto hovorim, ze ekonomicka vyhoda je diskutabilna. Pretoze keby bolo 62% vyrobenych aut zmatkami, tak si auta nikt nebude kupovat. Pri SW vsak ochotne pri rovnakej zmatkovosti plati za SW a potm sa cuduje...
Vyucba .NET-om a JAVA-ou (to druhe som dokonca nuteny robit) Vytvara dojem, ze programovat moze kazdy...
Co nie je pravda ani zdaleka
Despite the enormous changes which have taken place since electronic computing was invented
in the 1950s, some things remain stubbornly the same. In particular, most people can’t learn to
program: between 30% and 60% of every university computer science department’s intake fail the
first programming course
in the first administration
they divided into three distinct groups with no overlap at all:
• 44% used the same model for all, or almost all, of the questions. We call this the consistent
group.
• 39% used different models for different questions. We call this the the inconsistent group.
• The remaining 8% refused to answer all or almost all of the questions. We call this the blank
group.
have found that computer scientists and other programmers have almost
all predicted that the blank group would be more successful in the course exam than the others:
Non-programming social scientists, mathematicians and historians, given the same
information, almost all pick the inconsistent group:
Remarkably, it is the consistent group, and almost exclusively
the consistent group, that is successful.
http://www.eis.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/pa... ...
Suma sumarum programovat vie len uzka skupina ludi s konzistentnym myslenim, Konzistentne myslenie sa neda naucit, musi byt vrodene.
.NET a JAVA a ich propagacia ako prvych jazykov, predbvaju akurat iluziu, ze aj clovek s nekonzistentmy myslenim moze vediet programovat. Ak niekto je v skupine s konzistentnym myslenim je mu jednoa, aky jazyk pouziva.
Balmer zalozil svoje podnikanie na predaji iluzie, ze neodbornik na IT vie pracovat z pocitacom. To vsak nie je prvada, len iluzia. To iste je ucenie .NET a JAVA. Ak ma niekto odprogramaovanych 10. rokov v C(JSI) tak mu pomozu. Ak ich pozuije zacitocnik uskodia mu.
>V podstate si neponukol ziadne riesenie. Ziadnu alternativu.
To mi pise ten, co v IT diskusii pouziva len ekoinomicke nie technicke argumenty
Alternativa je jednoznacna
1. Pocitace maju pouzivat len odbornic na IT, nie siroka verejnost
>Ze to maju robit madari? Ale prosim ta... to nie je riesenie, ale blabol - aj ked viem, ze si to myslel troska s nadsazkou.
Nemyslel som to az tak z nadsazkou. Jednoduchao ak mame predpoklady na jeden typ IT robne len ten jediny..
Ro znamna uzka speciliazcia IT sektora v state.
Výskumník a vyučujúci predmetu Unix/Linux... na 101. najlepšej univerzite v oblasti informatika na svete shanghairanking.com/SubjectCS2012.html , . ACM Professional member #5480576
